Friday, April 17, 2015

The trial of Eugene Vasilyeva came to the finish line – BFM.Ru

At a recent meeting of the victims refused to claim the former military clerk and other persons involved in one of the major episodes of the case

& # x415; & # x432; & # x433; & # x435; & # x43D; & # x438; & # x44F; & # x412; & # x430; & # x441; & # x438; & # x43B; & # x44C; & # x435; & # x432; & # x430;
Eugene Vasilyeva Photo: Michael Pochuev / TASS

The trial of the former official’s Defense Ministry Evgenia Vasilyeva, accused of embezzling nearly 3 billion rubles, came to the finish line. On Friday in Moscow Presnensky court concluded the judicial investigation. At the final stage of the proceedings the victims refused to claim one of the major episodes of the case. According to media reports, it is about 2.2 billion rubles. Protection Vasilyeva argues that claims withdrawn for the full amount of imputed ex-clerk damage – 2.8 billion rubles.

The debate parties, during which the public prosecutors will request period for Vasilyeva and her alleged accomplices, scheduled for April 23.

9 months in court

In the case of Eugenia Vasilyeva Presnensky Court of Moscow began to understand on July 10 last year. It was then launched a judicial investigation. The former head of the Department of Property Relations of the Ministry of Defense (DIO) Investigative Committee of Russia (MRS) to incriminate the sale of the property of the military department at a lower price. It was about the buildings, stocks and land, which the Ministry of Defense considered “non-core assets».

According to the prosecution, they were sold at a lower price, and their customers have been pre-determined. Often, Vasilyeva objects sold itself through controlled firms. In this case, the official has received illegal agency fee for finding buyers. Them to the Ministry of Defense was the center of legal support “Expert”, for which she was Vasiliev. Led them to a friend of ex-head of the DIO Catherine Smetana and Dinara Bilyalov (their cases were identified in a separate proceeding. Bilyalov already received a three-year term).

At the same Vasilyeva before court her former classmate Zakutaylo Maxim and Larissa Egorina, worked with her in Petersburg branch of a large construction company Yuri Grehnёv, as well as its informal treasurer Irina Egorova.

Former clerk charged with 12 criminal episodes committed between February 2010 and January 2012. Actions Vasilyeva and its partners, depending on the role of each investigation qualified for a number of articles of the Criminal Code: fraud, attempted fraud, money laundering, abuse, and abuse of office and embezzlement of entrusted property (ch. 4, v. 159, p. 3 art . 30, part 4 of Art. 159, § 3 st.174.1, Part 3 of Art. 286, 201 and Part 1 of Art. 160 of the Criminal Code). Guilt figures of not guilty.

Conclusion protection

Protection Vasilyeva said that during the trial the prosecutor’s office failed to prove that the defendant or one of the other defendants violated the law. As stated BFM.ru lawyer ex-official’s Hasan Ali Borok, in the debate of the defense will insist on making the defendant not guilty. “Having examined all the evidence, we have come to a definite conclusion that in five episodes of the event itself is not a crime, while the rest – there is no crime,” – said the defender. Counsel believes that there is no evidence of a crime on the episodes sale of property at reduced prices, because “even the experts invited by the prosecution showed that the price difference is within the tolerances.” “They explained that the evaluation activity is not accurate. The real price of the property being sold only defines the market, and the board of directors has the right to appoint the price at which it is sold, “- said the Bohrok.

Counsel argues LAC” Expert “(converted to LLC” World “) and company-evaluators were real, not fictitious activity, which was confirmed in court questioned witnesses. “This was confirmed by dozens of witnesses on the part of buyers and sellers from, as well as the employees themselves” Worlds “- said the Bohrok.

Disclaimer billion lawsuit

On Friday, RIA “Novosti” reported that representatives of a number of victims (Ministry of Defense, as well as the company’s “Oboronservis” and “Oboronstroy”) rejected the claim against the defendant for the sum of 2.2 billion rubles for one of the major episodes of the case – the sale shares 31st State Design Institute of Special Construction “(” 31st GPISS “).

In December 2011, the securities were sold for 142 million rubles, though the real market value of the institution and its subsidiaries amounted to 2 billion 251 million rubles. Illegal payments “expert” agency fees for the sale of the object then was 81.3 million rubles. In February 2012, Vasiliev resigned from gosluzhby and became chairman of the board of directors of the company, passed under its control. Rejection of the claim in court explained that in 2013 the buyer voluntarily returned to the ownership of shares of the Institute of the Russian Federation.

However, a spokesman for the TFR Vladimir Markin said on Friday that it is not to deny the claim, but only its refinement.

«The rest of the plaintiff’s claims against Evgenia Vasilyeva and other defendants remain unchanged, and it is almost a billion rubles, – he said. – But this is not to say that the damage from the crime became less – as it was 3 billion rubles, and stayed. And no merit in the defendant’s return more than 2 billion to the state is not, and the characterization of its action is absolutely no effect ».

However, the protection Vasilyeva claims that the Ministry of Defence and controlled by the organization he was refused the claim, and Markin just do not know what happens in court. According to Hasan Ali Borokova, the amount of the withdrawn claim even more than reported by the media and the Investigative Committee and the full amount of damage to impute Vasilyeva – 2 billion 858 million rubles.

«April 16 Defense Ministry spokesman, possessing all the powers signed by the current Minister, in the hearing completely abandoned the claim in the amount of 2 billion 858 million rubles, but did not specify it. Also from this action refused “Oboronservis” and “Oboronstroy”, “- said the lawyer BFM.ru. He noted that he has on his hands supporting documents this fact. According to the lawyer, the refusal of victims of lawsuits shows the innocence of the defendants. “This confirms what we have said from day one – the state no damage to any penny” – he said.

It is worth noting that, according to participants in the process, many victims in court ” duplicated “claims:” Everyone thought that the money should be returned to him. Therefore, the total amount of claims filed during the investigation was not even 2.8 billion rubles, and about 9 billion rubles, “- said BFM.ru one of them, who requested anonymity. Now, he said, the victims have corrected their claims, declared at the stage of investigation.

In the 31st GPISSa were claims

By the way, the representative of 31- GPISSa of the court, the lawyer Alexei Gorb said BFM.ru, that his organization had not withdrawn the claim to Eugene Vasilyeva. It still is 587,946,000 rubles. This amount came from the sale of buildings damage Institute at a lower price (buyer for them in 2011 paid 1 billion 627 million rubles, which was reduced by 505 million real value). Institute also claims to 81 million rubles, which were paid in the form of company Vasilyeva agency fee. In addition, the applicant considers that the ex-official in the institution should return 651 000 rubles. “With this amount it had paid for trips to places for recreation, although they were registered as business trips. However, Vasiliev has not yet been reported, what she was doing on these trips, “- said the lawyer.

He also confirmed that his office did not refuse and not going to abandon the charges on the main episode of the case.

It is expected that the planned April 23 debate of the parties will take more than one day. Once they deliver the charge will be the turn of protection. Then, each of the five defendants will have the final word, and only if the court retired to sentencing. Most likely, the judge Tatyana Vasiuchenka announce it after the May holidays.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment