Photo: RIA Novosti
About disagreement with the report of the Security Council of the Netherlands, said deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency, Oleg Storchevoy. “It seems that instead of sequential analysis of objective data Commission engaged in supply of evidence at a pre-selected version” – said Storchevoy at a news conference, RIA Novosti reported.
The findings, presented in the report, Storchevoy called “the root infidels “and stressed that Russia categorically disagrees with them. “The level of irrationality in the report just rolls over” – he said (quoted by Interfax).
Storchevoy pointed out that the report of the Netherlands does not meet the standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The report, as stated by deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency. “Not full of facts, confirming the usefulness and validity of the study».
According to the Federal Air Transport Agency, the Dutch investigation failed to prove the existence of damaging elements – the so-called I-beams (in English terminology “butterfly”), typical of the missile warhead 9N314M of missiles 9M38 or 9M38M1, which on the eve said the Dutch investigators.
«shape and chemical composition of the actual damaging elements such as” butterfly “after the explosion of a missile type SAM” Buk “, and this is confirmed by the experiments have nothing to do with what is presented in the final report, “- said Storchevoy. According to him, Russia has repeatedly asked “to draw attention to these inconsistencies».
Storchevoy said that even at the first meeting with the Dutch side of Russia was a version of that Boeing was knocked out of the Snow (at the time of disaster This town was controlled by the militias). As evidence of this was presented to “the only allegedly found striking element in the shape of a butterfly.” At the same time the Netherlands said to representatives of Russia, have found this piece “in a cabin somewhere in the insulating winding».
Storchevoy noted that all the findings that the aircraft was shot down by a rocket-type “Book” were made solely on the basis of fragments of damaging elements such as “Butterfly”, unique to rockets “Buk-M1″. Storchevoy said that these submunitions have been presented by the Dutch side in order “to ensure that the investigation in the right direction.” He suggested that the data that the missile was fired from a snowy, similar to the “homework” of the Ukrainian authorities with the commission of inquiry into the disaster.
According to the deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency, international investigation concealed from Russia that at the crash site were found fragments belonging missile anti-missile system “Buk”. Russia learned about it only in August, when the comments on the report of the Netherlands has not been taken.
According Storchevoy now Russia has no definitive evidence that confirms that the aircraft was launched a rocket type “Book”.
The deputy head of Federal Air Transport Agency also stressed that “the fundamental and primary cause” of the crash was that the Ukrainian authorities have not closed its airspace.
The report was presented to the Security Council of the Netherlands 13 October. It says that the plane was shot down by a missile “land – air” with a warhead 9N314M of anti-aircraft missile systems “Buk”. The exact location was not disclosed in the report, as the place indicated the ability to run an area of 320 square meters. km.
No comments:
Post a Comment