Image copyright EPA Russia strongly disagrees with the conclusions of the commission of the Netherlands about the crash airline Malaysia Airlines MH17 July 17 last year in eastern Ukraine and initiate the resumption of the investigation. Russian experts argue that Russia was not provided evidence of submunitions from the Russian missiles at the plane crash site.
On Wednesday, said the deputy head of Federal Air Transport Agency. The authorities of the self-proclaimed DNR also responded to the publication of the report on the collapse of the “Boeing”, calling its findings “politicized and partisan”.
In released on Tuesday, the report of the commission of the Netherlands said that the bodies of three crew members, as well as in the wreckage Aircraft managed to find amazing elements of non-alloy steel, typical of the missile systems “Buk” (model 9N314M). The warhead of this model is in service with the Russian army.
Rosaviation: proof enough
The key piece of evidence that points to a specific model rockets are striking elements of the profile ” I-beams, “reminiscent of a butterfly.
However, it said on Wednesday the deputy head of Federal Air Transport Agency, Oleg Storchevoy, Russia presented only one striking element in the shape of a butterfly.
” The submission of such an important fact, naturally puzzled us. We are interested in where he was seized and where it was found, how it was decorated. We were told that it was found in a cabin somewhere in the insulation winding. Good. It’s like a documentary record? documented? You can show us some proof? Nothing ever did so “- said Storchevoy.
Therefore, he said, “Federal Air Transport Agency does not have the final information that Malaysian” Boeing “of Donetsk was hit by a missile from the plant” Buk “.
” Today, the Russian Federation continues research on possible damage to the aircraft, “- said the deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency.
Federal Air Transport Agency also considers the erroneous interpretation of the Netherlands as the trajectory of the missile, shot down a Malaysian” Boeing “and its model.
” version of the Dutch about the defeat of the plane defined missile was based on the number of submunitions “- said Storchevoy.
According to the deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency, the report of the Dutch side does not meet ICAO standards.
” The primary cause of the accident was that that the Ukrainian authorities, using combat aircraft, not darkened the skies, as required by international aviation rules, “- said Storchevoy.
Reaction DNR
The head of the breakaway DNR Alexander Zakharchenko told BBC BBC commented on the findings of the report of the commission of the Netherlands: “All that is said in the report, is that the plane was shot down. Missiles. They do not speak, whose missile it was or where it was issued “.
According to him, the investigation was not carried out properly.
” Why do Malaysians did not give access [to the crash site ]? They still have not seen all the debris “.
Zakharchenko reiterated that the DNI at the disposal has been no rocket launcher” Beech “.
” I do not know what happened with this plane. If it had been shot down, “Buck”, it means that he was released from the Ukrainian territory of Ukrainian troops, – he said. – Ukraine should close their airspace when there are fights. Ukraine did not, and then we are accused of all sorts of political games “.
On the question of the correspondent Bi-bi-si Tom Burridge why in the day of the catastrophe leaders DNI posted a statement saying they shot down a Ukrainian transport aircraft, Zakharchenko said: “This statement must have been a fake”.
The representative of the Ministry of Defence of the self-proclaimed DNI Eduard Eduard Basurin called the conclusion of the report “politicized and partisan,” adding: “The conclusions of the Netherlands is wrong to not fit together.”
According to him, “natural experiments” carried out by Russian specialists in “Almaz-Antey”, saying that the missile launch area, the aircraft struck the other. As Russian experts, Eduard Basurin believes that the missile was put out of the village Zaroschenskoe who, as the representative of the unrecognized republic, controlled while the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
On the question of the BBC BBC about why local residents do not support the allegations of the presence of Ukrainian troops in the area and did not hear any bursts that day, Eduard Basurin said that they could not be aware of who controlled the area, and the roar of the rocket launch could not be heard because of the the noise of fighting.
He rejected one of the findings of the Dutch experts that the bodies of the victims were subjected to some manipulation prior to their transfer to medical experts in the West.
As a result of the investigation the Dutch authorities came concluded that the flight MH17 was hit by a missile complex “Buk” fired from the territory of Eastern Ukraine.
No comments:
Post a Comment