Tuesday, September 29, 2015

On the pages of leading publications discussing Vladimir Putin’s speech at the UN General Assembly – First Channel

observers, including Western, note that the speech of the Russian president was filled with concrete, but with all the rigidity of language – without that is called, go to the individual. Paul Pchelkina learned opinion.

Analysts, including Western, noted that it was filled with Russian President specifics, but the rigidity of the whole language – no, they say, the transition to the individual. Paul Pchelkina learned opinion.

Speech by Russian President caused a lot of emotions in the West. Not to say that all of them were positive, but certainly most commentators recognize that Washington proclaimed the isolation of Russia and remained her fantasy enemies. But everything else, the Russian president, it seems, failed to prove that the crafty policy of the West in the fight against “Islamic state” has failed, and he offered a real way out of the impasse.

“impressed that Mr. Putin has a clear understanding of what he was going to do. That’s why it sounds like the lead singer, while Mr. Obama has forced him to accompany. For the first time in many years, Russia acts as a leader, United States – as the main ally of the leader. This is a completely new situation in comparison with what we saw 20-30 years ago, “- said Dr. Political Economy Institute in Paris, Ivan Blo.

Living in Paris, Ivan is very Blo I surprised after reading the morning the French press. After all, he says, all have become accustomed to anti-Russian articles from leading newspapers. And suddenly this change.

For example, an excerpt from today’s “Figaro”: “Barack Obama – the words of Vladimir Putin – business. On Monday morning, at a meeting of the United Nations in New York, the eyes of the world were glued to the Russian president, chief conductor bold, innovative score to the topic of settlement in Syria. From the rostrum of the United Nations, the Russian leader proposed the adoption of Security Council resolution aimed at “coordinating all activities in the fight against LIH” creating “this broad international antiterrorist coalition, similar to the anti-Hitler coalition” during the Second World War “.

Surprisingly, the author of the article in” The New York Post, “without saying a word with the French repeat some abstract, almost word for word. In an article titled “Obama said Putin acts – guess who gets results,” says: “Finally, the undisputed world leader is the true superiority in the Middle East in general, and within the framework of the Syrian crisis in particular. Unfortunately, this leader – Russian President Vladimir Putin, not Barack Obama “.

Many publications have noted, Putin without hostility, but said firmly: the West in the Middle East intended to, often far from the fight against terrorism. He politely did not mention the country, but everyone knows who was behind the coup and chaos in the region. “Look what you’ve done?” Putin was quoted phrase. And everyone understood to whom he was referring.

“This is addressed to the West. The West in recent years, was the initiator of the so-called Arab revolution. The West, the United States, Turkey supported the” Islamic state. “Now they are facing fragments of its policies is something that just said, Putin. Let them now look to the East, what they did, they are now able to look yourself in the flow of refugees to Europe “- said , Deputy Chief Editor Compact (Berlin), Martin Müller.

“Unfortunately, too many in Washington to ensure its security at the expense of others, creating additional risks for other states. And that performance was subdued, despite the fact that the President has shown that we understand who and how to organize those very difficult situations in the world that we are witnessing, in the speech there was aggression, and that’s very important, “- said General Director of Foreign Policy Research Institute and initiatives, a member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation Veronica Krasheninnikov.

In the first place stable and sometimes prosperous countries in the region, there was a heavily armed terrorist enclave. And Putin said bluntly: it is the result of Western policy, which it’s time to admit mistakes. Master of American journalism, a leading CNN en Kristjan Amanpour, can hardly be suspected of sympathizing with Russia and the Kremlin. But her comment speech of the Russian president, “he said very clearly that the world is made a mistake by not cooperating with the Syrian government is not cooperating with Assad, Assad – is the only person able to fight” Islamic state “and fought with him. And then, Putin said that the only way out of this tragic situation – is the restoration of the state and its structures. It is his view of what is happening in Syria, and it is a very sensible opinion. He touched on something that concerned most of the world, that is, the defeat of ” Islamic state, but added “a cherry on top of the pudding” – called for Assad to leave at the moment. This is a serious matter, because now President Obama and others, obviously, are going to go this way “.

It is unlikely that anyone will argue: absurd one hand to fight terrorists in the region, and the other to strike the one who named it resists. That said, Putin is actually the Western media is well understood, but, for obvious reasons, was silent, glancing at Washington. And now, it seems, has broken through.

“The President of Russia Vladimir Putin in the fight against “Islamic state” is a completely different course than the one that elected Obama administration. You can talk about the creation of “a rival coalition.” Maneuver Russia not only allows Moscow military support for Assad, but can also give the Kremlin to influence the choice of a successor to Assad if he will eventually have to leave his post, “- writes” The New York Times “.

“Moscow watched as clumsy act West, especially in a situation where Iraq and Libya chaos. Western support for the so-called “moderate” opposition in Syria – it is self-deception. Syria is the only choice – between Assad terrible and horrible and dangerous “Islamic state.” For Putin, the choice is simple. He comes to the rescue Assad to LIH not “inherit” Syria. And Putin added that the West must join his efforts as West LIH also poses a risk, “- said,” The Independent “.

It seems that here the interests of the majority of mankind are the same hence it is necessary to set aside some of his claims to other countries and try to form a coalition here. I do not believe that as soon as possible to create such a coalition in the 40’s during World War II. Well, about some coordination, I think we can say some coordination may soon be established, “- says editor in chief of the journal” Expert “Valery Fadeev.

John Leklend – British political analyst who lives in France, noted a surprising difference between the performances of the presidents of Russia and the United States. If Obama for an hour, all taught didactic tone, Putin on fingers explained the reasons for the problem and offer a solution. US nodded. But European leaders immediately saluted by signing in the absence of an independent foreign policy.

The fate of Syria will now depend on the agreement between Russia and America. They left behind even the performance of the Secretary-General of the United Nations – it has not listed them in the list of countries that may affect the settlement of the conflict. If I were French or British diplomat or official representative, I would be very ashamed for my country “- said John Leklend.

Of course, not everyone will agree with this, but in the logic of Putin will not give up. On acquiescence of the Old World US actually bend under international law itself increasingly act in circumvention of the UN and in breach of the principles of the WTO to impose economic sanctions.

“Putin’s speech for all its confrontation was very unifying. Russia is ready to unite with anyone as you like, if only it was a legitimate decision of the UN and a good excuse – LIH fight, the struggle for the development of the global market. Middle and large this message is really like. The value of Russia as uniting the country, unlike the United States, that split, Putin’s speech will be met with more positive than Obama’s speech “, – the president of the Center for Global interests Nikolai Zlobin.

Most of the publications, regardless of their political orientation, admit that in spite of all attempts to force our country to the margins of world politics, Russia is an important global player, whose interests have to be considered. It is possible to rejoice or regret it, but the fact remains.

Paul Pchelkin

Management Information Programs

Reporter plots Total: 471

‘ );} $ (“#insert_blogs_add”). html (txt1); $ (“# Insert_blogs_aded01″). Text (txt); $ (“#copytextarea”). Val ($ (“#insert_blogs_add”). Html ()); $ (“# Insert_blogs_aded02″). Text (txt); }} Break; }}}});

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment